DID CHINA SHOOT DOWN MH 370

China warship 

WAS MH 370 DOWNED BY A CHINESE MISSILE

There is growing speculation in both diplomatic and in media circles that the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 may have been brought down in the South China Sea in an area patrolled and controlled by China.

The testimony of New Zealand oil rig worker Mike McKay as relayed to ABC journalist Bob Woodruff, corroborates the evidence of Kota Baru based fisherman Azid Ibrahim and residents of an atoll in the disputed South China Sea that an aircraft resembling the ill fated MAS 370 was seen flying low then in a fireball crashing into the South China Sea.

What follows in Kiwi Mike McKay’s observation is consistent with that of an aircraft having been hit by a missile from the ground (sea) or air which would have hastened the demise of the plane, its crew and passengers in a fireball.

Description of the aircraft’s low flying manouvers given by Azid Ibrahim is described by a retired US fighter pilot as being ‘consistent with an aircraft evading radar when intercepted’.

Whatever theory one follows in this mystery, one thing is clear, China a very vocal critic of Malaysia’s handling of the crisis has been noticeably less than candid, cooperative or transparent in assisting with discovering whatever it is that happened to MH 370.

If the truth be known, China’s conduct  throughout this sorry episode raises very serious questions about its probity in the handling of information and facts in the disappearance of MH 370. Its criticisms of Malaysia have been vocal but its assistance and disclosures on the mystery has been less than transparent, helpful or honest. But this is China one is dealing with.

China whilst demanding transparency and openness of others like Malaysia has no history or recent record of tolerance of democratic practices, no free press, no free speech, no open debate, no criticism of the state or questioning of its practices. Yet China demands much more from states like Malaysia who they vilify through their local Chinese community agents.

WHAT MAY HAVE HAPPENED

Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah or more likely First Officer Fariq Abdul Hamid who may have been in control at the time, may have panicked on seeing an armed fighter jet next to him at night and chosen the alternative course of action instinctively of going below radar to get away from the Chinese interceptors.

Fariq Abdul Hamid the lesser experienced of the two pilots may have never had the experience of encountering an armed fighter jet mid flight in his career. And not many pilots do.

International Aviation Rules requires pilots of interceptors aircraft (in this case Chinese) to rock their wings and at night, flash lights to tell the crew of the intruding plane: ”You have been intercepted. Follow me.” The rules call for the off-course plane (if it was MH 370) to duplicate the procedure to signal: ”Understood, will comply.” The off course aircraft ( if it was Malaysian Airlines MH370) is then required to descend to an altitude where it is safely able to lower its landing gear and lower it as a sign of compliance.

THE DOWNING OF LIBYAN AIRLINER BY ISRAEL 1979

In 1979 A Libyan civilian Airliner was brought down by Israel killing all aboard because as Israel claimed at the time “the pilot refused to comply with international civil aviation rules“. That reasoning was debunked by their own admission years later to be a lie and utter nonsense. It was a deliberate military action against Libya.

Details and the full truth of that shooting down of a civilian airliner emerged a decade later when former Israeli Mossad agent, Victor Ostrowski  described the events in his book “By Way of Deception” as the deliberate action by Israel in bringing down the Libyan airliner in the mistaken belief it was carrying Abu Nidal a notorious Palestinian resistance fighter aboard.

MH 370 may not have strayed its course, although if it did, straying from the course is not uncommon in civilian or military aviation. Panic stations in such circumstances is not unusual either.

The Chinese after all claim all of the South China Sea and beyond as theirs. The Chinese have demonstrated in recent times a propensity to use force to make their point as they also have in the past with the US, Japan and other countries passing through the East and South China Seas.

LOCAL CHINESE AND DIVERSIONARY TACTICS IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTHERLAND

The local Malaysian Chinese population through people like MP Hannah Yeoh and her party boss, the perennial opposition leader Lim Kit Siang, both ethnic Chinese, have been goading the government of Malaysia with their scurrilous and defamatory claims with provocative racial slurs published in “Chinglish”  on their blogs and tweets  about the disappearance of MH370.

Both Kit Siang and Hannah Yeoh somehow appear to believe that the Malay government is responsible for the disappearance of MH 370.

The many Chinese of Malaysia now join the unholy chorus of China Chinese in repeating those slurs against the Malay government and its people at every given opportunity.

Kit Siang like Hannah Yeoh bars and censors anyone from his blog who holds a view that is different to his or in any way seeks to dampen his and Hannah Yeoh’s Chinese chauvinistic rants against especially Malaysia’s majority Malays.

China (and others who support them in the region) has now desperately diverted the search for MH 370 from the most probable area of where the plane may have gone down (the South China Sea) to the southern Indian ocean and Turkmenistan.

The Muslim bogey and the confused Malay theory both are easily believable and plausible theories amongst many in the gullible west promoted by Malaysia’s Chinese.

Many now believe the current diversion to the Southern Indian Ocean is a convenient ruse to enable the Chinese to mop up the mess in their area of control in the South China Sea or at least to continue with the search on their own terms.

Even if debris is now found in the southern Indian ocean it could have originated from many different points of origin.

CHINA’S IDEA OF INTERNATIONAL RULES

The arrogance of the Chinese by their behaviour and their unique distorted ideas of observance of international aviation rules is legend.

For instance in its 2001 conduct of intercepting a US Navy EP3 Orion over Hainan Island it broke every law of the air and sea. In the Hainan Island incident China’s fighter jets rammed a US EP3 Orion in breach of internationally accepted aviation rules in the first of many such incidents involving the Chinese navy and its airforce in the south China Sea. Not much confidence in their civility when it comes to observance of civil aviation rules. China’s behavior was violent, aggressive and overboard.

China does not have a history of compliance with international rules even in the conduct of its civilian aviation industry. Its heavy handedness and crude diplomacy leaves a lot to be desired. But “who will bell the cat?”

What most observers do not see is the unprecedented level of militarization of the South China sea by China especially around those atolls which China has a dominant presence and makes unilateral claims over.

Viet Nam, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, the Philippines and Taiwan all lay claim to the atolls in the south China sea especially the Spratleys .but it is China that has aggressively patrolled the area engaging in firefights with the Philippines and Viet Nam on numerous occasions. No example of them adhering to the civil norms of maritime or civil aviation regulations and laws.

CHINA THREATENS WAR WITH JAPAN

China in January of 2014 unilaterally declared the area around the Senkaku islands claimed by both China and Japan to be its own sovereign territory. In November 2013, China announced the creation of a new air-defence identification zone, which would demand any aircraft in the zone to comply with a number of rules laid down by Beijing.

The area covers the airspace above the disputed islands, and also overlaps with Japan’s claimed air-defence zone. Japan labelled the move a “unilateral escalation”. The US has moved to beef up the Japanese air defences whilst Taiwan and the Philippines have sought to shore up their own offensive capabilities in the face of Chinese aggression aided by foreign Chinese settler communities.

SOUTH EAST ASIANS KOW TOWING TO CHINA

China treats its south east Asian neighbours with little respect bordering on contempt because of its over bearing physical size, its economic might and its military strength. South East Asia is slavishly tied to China through trade. An almost untenable a one way situation in favour of China.

Part of the blame with the relationship lies with the south east Asian governments themselves having to deal with a restive, avaricious and sizeable local Chinese populations with fierce loyalties to the mainland. Having yielded much of their own territorial and political sovereignty to an aggressive and expansionist China these governments have little to bargain with now. Malaysia included.

South east Asian government’s (excepting the Philippines), have ‘kow towed’ to the Chinese since its economic liberalization, seeking economic favours in return. China in turn emboldened by their might hold many of these little nations captive and does as it pleases with each of them. Malaysia is now feeling the heat of its subservience to China having put all of its ‘eggs’ as it were in the Chinese basket.

Today the Chinese so well entrenched politically and economically in south east Asia are able to run riot over the other five countries excepting Taiwan. Each of these nations have an equal if not more legitimate claim to the disputed regions in the south China sea but are helpless against the dragon.

China uses its proxies in the region to destabilize non compliant governments as it did during the time of Mao. Chinese “opposition groups” like the MCA and DAP in Malaysia and the Kuomintang now reformed, all with allegiance to the “motherland” have served to undermine the political integrity, stability and sovereignty of countries like Malaysia.

A very high powered Malaysia delegation has left for China over the last few days seeking to pacify the ‘angry’ Chinese who suggest that Malaysia is not doing  enough to find the missing MH 370 aircraft which carried a large compliment of Chinese nationals.

CHINA’S HISTORY OF AIR AND SEA PIRACY

If China as suspected did in fact shoot down the aircraft, they have every means of concealing their mischief as they always have done throughout history.

China is able to strong arm the Malaysian government. It is able to bully the economically weaker US and Europe especially at this moment of strained relations between Europe and Moscow. More to the point they are able to remove any trace (if there is any left) of MH 370 if indeed MH 370 was shot down by a Chinese missile in disputed waters claimed and patrolled by them.

China thus far remains the only country that has not contributed in a transparent way to the search effort. It says a lot of things with little to show for its ‘efforts’.

During the search China threatened and forced Viet Namese jets and patrol boats it claimed was ‘breaching its territorial waters’. 

China has assisted foreign reporters in Malaysia and in China to orchestrate highly emotive scenes and ‘gate crashing’ at ministerial press briefings in Kuala Lumpur yet it has denied the international media any opportunity  to speaking with Chinese ministry of defence officials in order to quiz them about what they the Chinese know about the disappearance of MH375.

China and the Chinese in general have never ever understood the meaning of transparency or openness. It remains an authoritarian, closed, undemocratic totalitarian state.

Malaysia and all of South East Asia in the meantime although suspicious of the Chinese feel threatened and are vulnerable to destabilization of their governments through withdrawal of investment and political activity driven by local Chinese communities funded by their and other foreign money.

WHY THEY ALL NEED CHINA NOW

Of all the countries that would have superior technology in the air and under the sea all visible from their satellites is Russia. But the US and Europe in recent days have gravely miscalculated the strength and resolve of Russia over the Ukraine crisis and have in the process alienated the Russians creating a siege situation in Crimea. 

The US, Europe and their allies have badly damaged their relations with Russia. They now need a cooperative and compliant China as a bulwark against an assertive Russia to redress the military and economic imbalance it now faces from Russia in Europe and in the rest of the world. With a revived expansive Russian economic and military machine pitted against western anti Russian propaganda China always has the upper hand.
Echoes of KAL 007 all over again. No debris just speculation and stonewalling from the Communists.

About these ads

8 thoughts on “DID CHINA SHOOT DOWN MH 370

  1. “The off course aircraft ( if it was Malaysian Airlines MH370) is then required to descend to an altitude where it is safely able to lower its landing gear and lower it as a sign of compliance.”

    Whilst there are disputes over islands in the South China Sea, MH370 was bound for Beijing anyway, so why the need to resort to this action, to show what, especially when the majority of the passengers on board are China citizens and many of the rest are ethnic Chinese?

    Whilst I don’t deny that China too has hegemonistic intentiions, some patriotic Malaysian suspect that if there indeed was the hand of a foreign power in this, it would be more the hand of the U.S. to drive a wedge between Malaysia and China to break Malaysia’s close economic association with China and bring Malaysia more into the U.S. fold.

    If China’s military planes had intercepted MH370, would they have followed it all the way into the Indian Ocean and alert other militaries in the region?

    I wouldn’t take the statements and of Lim Kit Siang, Hannah Yeoh, etc. as indications that they are doing so on behalf of China, since this is typical of the “barking watchdog” mindset of the DAP, which I believe is rooted in their resignation to forever being a party in opposition, since as way back as the 1980s and 90s. This legacy has remained within them, even now when they stand a chance of becoming a party in possible future ruling coalition.

    This barking dog mentality is quite obvious in the likes of Tony Pua, who barks over Malaysia’s purchase of submarines, litoral combat ships, the MRT project, etc without offering viable alternatives.

    It’s quite typical of the DAP to use any opportunity to criticise the BN government to gain political mileage.

    Within that opposition, Anwar has received much support from the west, especially the United States, as well as the many pro-opposition NGOs, all of which are also not friendly to China.

    I also understand from sources, that some leading opposition MPs have gone on trips to the U.S., of several weeks each, which are sponsored by the U.S. State Department, during which time they were briefed by State Department officials.

    This was the same with some key figures, including students who participated in Egypt’s “Arab Spring” which ousted Mubarak.

    When I first heard of the sudden disappearance of MH370 on 8th March morning, one of the possibilities I thought of was that ht had been shot down by a missile, fired perhaps mistakenly or by accident, like that US missile which brought down the Iran Air Airbus which had just taken off from Bandar Abbas, and whoever’s missile brought down MH370 is trying to hide the fact.

    Note again, this was just speculation on my part.

    1. You do make some very valid points here Schiess. But alls fair in love and war.
      Korean Airlines 007 suffered a similar fate. It is not who is on board the aircraft (unless of course they
      are precious cargo) China had everything to gain. Civilian aircraft are merely civilian variants of aircraft
      designed for military / dual use. They can carry highly sensitive equipment on board with dual uses as well.
      They could test the frequencies on which Chinese radar (on the ground) work, they are able to photograph and
      collect all sorts of data. No Military on the level of alert the Chinese are on in the South China Sea will chance anything
      flying over a restricted zone without their consent. Not even a US E 3 Orion with a full US fleet in tow in the region.
      It is often after the incident that the cover up begins.

      As for Kit Siang and Hannah Yeoh they are another variant of an old devil Chin Peng. I don’t see anything innocent in their
      calculated diatribe against the Malaysians.

      1. Kumar,

        It’s not impossible that MH370 had surveillance equipmemt secretly installed onboard but whilst its transponder was working, it’s less likely that China would have shot it down, though perhaps after the transponder had been switched off or disabled.

        The Orion is a different matter, as it’s clearly a military aircraft and eventhen, China did not shoot it down but harassed it.

        I belive that of China knew that there was surveillance equipment on board a civilian airliner, they would have sent warplanes to intercepted it and tell the pilot to change course, rtaher than to shoot it down.

        Also, if it had been shot down,I’m sure the plane would have broken up in mid air and there would be debris and bodies floating in the South China Sea but there’s none.

        Kit Siang and Hannah may be using the same methods used by the Communist Party of Malaya but and yes, they are doing so to try to discredit the Malaysian government but that does not mean that they are doing so on the behest of China but rather to serve their own political ends. That’s been their style on may other issues before.

        Also, given that the DAP was formed from the remnant of the PAP in Malaysia after Singapore’s exclusion, would it not be more likely that they are doing so to serve Singapore’s interest.

        Here’s another conspiracy theory that MH370 was landed on Diego Garcia, so the U.S. could get hold of the Chinese Freescale “scientists and engineers who were developing a super sophisticated gyroscope for use on space craft.”

        http://www.erikrush.com/what-really-happened-to-malaysia-airlines-flight-370/

        My doubt about this theory is that Freescale (formerly Motorola semiconductor) designs, develops, manufactures and assembles semiconductor products and its plant in Petaling Jaya (formerly Motorola Malaysia) began as an assembly plant of semiconductor components and has moved up into some design work but I seriously doubt that conducts such high level, super secret R&D work in Malaysia, when such work would more likely be done in its global headquarters in Austin, Texas, the U.K. or Israel.

        http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/homepage.jsp?code=GLOBAL_SITES&tid=FSH

        Freescale has many offices around the world and its Malaysian facility is just one of many and according to its website, this is what its Malasian operations do.
        ==============
        Freescale in Malaysia

        Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn Bhd, located in Petaling Jaya, is a modern semiconductor facility for assembly and testing of integrated circuits (IC).

        With a built-up area of 750,000 sq. ft. on a 20-acre site, this facility is dedicated to assembly and testing of microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors, mixed signals and radio frequency (RF) integrated circuits (IC) for the Networking and Computing Systems, Transportation and Standard Product Systems and Wireless & Broadband Systems market segments.

        Since its establishment in 1972, this facility has been recognized through various awards by the government and industry for its contribution to the development and growth of human resource talent, the benchmarking of sustainable development and prosperity and well being of Malaysia.
        ================================================

        http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=MALAYSIA

        Note the words “dedicated to assembly and testing”, which means it’s an assembly and testing plant of these finished high-tech products or to put it another way, Freescale in Malaysia performs the lowest tech operations of high tech products.

        Here is a list of job vacancies at Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia and clearly none of them is related to R&D work. Most of the technical jobs are regular manufacturing and production planning related.

        http://job-search.jobstreet.com.my/malaysia/company/freescale-semiconductor-malaysia-sdn-bhd-jobs/

        My first job was as a process engineer in National Semiconductor Electronics in Senawing, Negeri Sembilan way back in 1980 and our workers essentially did the labour intensive assembly work of what was a high tech product.

        We received the already fabricated semicondutor chips on circular silicon wafers and our workers diced up the wafers into individual chips, mounted them in their ceramic casing, mounted the metal lead frames, wired the relevant pads on the tiny silicon chips to their respective metal leads, sealed up the casing, tested them for air and fluid leakage, marked the relevant part numbers and other information on the package tops,cleaned and solder tinned the leads, trimmed off the metal part holding the legs of the integrated circuit together, then packed them into static-free tubes for shipping.

        The process engineers job was to design the stages and operations to be carried out in each line in the assembly process to achieve the best output yield versus numbers input to each priduction line and to trouble shoot the production process and any rectify any problems in them.

        Whilst we used highly sophisticated production equipmemt, we could just as well been making sweets, as there was no rocket science in our process engineering but rather trial and error and some common sense.

        Of couse, the work done in Malaysia today is more sophisticated than in 1980 but not all that much.

        I understand that these Chinese engineers had undergone training and familiarisation at its Malaysian plant and were returing to China to help set up its China operations.

        However, engineers at Intel in Penang are involved in its global R&D work and collaborate with Intel engineers worldwide, such as on the development of its latest 4th generation microprocessors codenamed “Haswell” which are now turning up in the latest PCs and tablet devices in computer stores.

        Nothing super high-tech about the Haswell processor, except for its lower standby power consumption, more efficient power management and marginally faster performance compared to its 3rd generation predecessor, dubbed “Ivy Bridge”. Intel intends Haswell for battery powered devices such as touch-screen ultrabooks and tablet devices, where efficient power consumption is paramount for long batetry life.

        Otherwise, Haswell retains the same 22 nanometre Fin Fet technology first introduced with its Ivy Bridge processors, with soem additional power tweaks here and there in Haswell.

        Fin Fet technology reduces the current through the chip’s transistors when its inactive and it was developed by a team of mostly Chinese researchers at the Universty of California at Berkeley and Intel adopted it.

        If the U.S. wanted these Freescale engineers, it would have been much simpler to give them green cards to come and work in teh US on much higher pay or simply buy them out with huge sums of money. Anyway, they already are working for Freescale, an American company, so why abduct them in such a way. It does not make sense.

        In his statement, this Eric Rush guy is also talking rubbish. “…and assures me that you can land a Lockheed C-5 Galaxy there. Those are the military transport planes they load tanks aboard, and they’re just about the size of a Boeing 777″

        The Lockheed C5 Galaxy is the largest military transport in the U.S. Air Force, which is larger that a Boeing 747, not “just about the size of a 777″ which is much smaller, though still a large plane.

        Unfortunately, the author Eric Rush has disabled comments on his site or I’ll challenge him onthese points.

      2. I believe that of China knew that there was surveillance equipment on board a civilian airliner, they would have sent warplanes to intercepted it and tell the pilot to change course, rather than to shoot it down.”
        Acting rationally it may be what they would have done. What we have suggested is that the panicked actions of a first officer on seeing a fighter jet so close to him at night would have instinctively led him to avoid the interceptor and to dive below radar. It is consistent with the evidence of those who claim to have seen the aircraft in its final moments.

        History shows that Chinese aircraft behaving like the Soviets who trained them. i.e. to shoot the aircraft without warning. KAL 007 9 years after the fall of the Soviet Union (documents and interviews reveal) that the Soviet pilot did not fire tracer bullets or give a warning but shot the Boeing 747 the moment it was about to leave Soviet airspace.

        The Hainan incident as described by us does not say the Chinese shot the Orion aircraft (which by the way has a civilian radar signature). It rammed into it. The Chinese fighter pilot if you remember lost his aircraft and his life but damaged the Orion sufficiently that it needed to descend and to land on Hainan. The intention was to destroy it nonetheless.

        Hannah and Kit Siang do have a political objective that is in harmony with that of the very belligerent Chinese government. The conspiracy theories rise when reason and logic fail to explain what reason and logic are otherwise reasonably capable of delivering as an answer to such events.

        We continue to deal with the information we receive from various sources and pass these by those who have dealt with similar situations in the past. As for the engineers on board, well there are less messy and complicated ways these things can be dealt with using technology women and money.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s