Bersih, a group of apologists and Trojans with a loud bang, but with little or no policy structures or policy initiatives in place. The group is bent on confrontation with government. They are nothing more than a flash mob thus far, showing no signs of political maturity of a political entity they claim to be. A flash mob seeking to overthrow government outside the ballot box.

Bersih’s campaign is one that is hate ridden and xenophobic to the core. None of Bersih leadership have the courage to come out and tell it openly like it is. This is an anti Malay and anti Islamic campaign. It has nothing to do with equality, egalitarian principles, democracy or civil societies. It is a naked attempt at a power grab outside the ballot box.

Ambiga Srinivasan at the head of this group is a lawyer by profession. She demonstrates none of the skills or training imbued in her as a lawyer. Nor does she demonstrate at an even a superficial level, an understanding of the need for evidence, in order to advance her many far fetched claims against government in Malaysia.

The essential ingredient and platform for resolving legal disputes in her view and from her actions thus far is to riot, to create a level of disruption and to disseminate falsehoods out of which she hope government will fall into her lap.

Ambiga Srinivasan is on record as having said the following to a public gathering:

 When people can change the Government, that is when the power come back to you“(sic).

She does not say which government. She does not acknowledge the government. Being a lawyer she ought to know what inferences she is inviting readers to draw from her comments in this regard. Or does she? I suspect not.


The people of Malaysia have ushered new governments in at least 12 times since its independence from Britain. They changed it for the first time in 3 centuries on 31 August 1957. On that day change moved from the British colonial administration to the independent government of the Tengku Abdul Rahman’s Alliance.  Bersih and its followers though, do not accept the verdict of a  majority. That is because that majority are Malays and Muslim to a large part.

Government and political parties are two different things. Ambiga and Bersih do not understand that difference. A political party is not government. Government even if from the same political party can be different in each of its compositions (all 12 of them in Malaysia’s context). Ambiga does not understand that. And she is a lawyer. 

One day in Dataran Merdeka can shatter all that has been built up over 60 years. Chinese and Indians too, merchants especially will suffer the consequences of that riot she plans. So too will the professionals like Ambiga amongst them. This is Chin Peng’s call from all those years ago. “We must do it for our future and the future of our children”.

60 odd years on he still calls these shots from his death bed in Bangkok. A new generation oblivious to the horrors of May 13 and the Chinese communist insurgency play out the various scenes from that bloody pantomime over and over again without regard for its consequences. It repeats that the deficits of the opposition will be cured again in the same way it occurred decades ago on May 13 and during the decades of the communist insurgency. This is an insurgency. It is a low level, intense conflict where the arms deployed are insults, provocation, incitement and some precipitous violence.

What Ambiga perhaps meant  in her statement above but did not have the courage to say is this: ” When non Malays change a Malay government, power will come back to the non Malays“. She actually says “the power”. Does that mean the power they enjoyed as non Malays before independence? or the power they enjoyed immediately  post independence, where the British ruled through their proxy of a lame Tengku Abdul Rahman?

Ambiga is as racist as the Nazi who suggested that Hitler could not have been an anti semite because his grandfather was a Jew as was his personal chef.

Ambiga  accuses the Barisan Nasional (BN the ruling political party) of rigging elections with the statement that the elections held in Malaysia were ‘not free or fair’. Yet she voted. So too did her colleagues in opposition at the last several general elections. Her allegations thus far are made through the alternative media without a scintilla of evidence to back up those claims of hers that the elections in Malaysia are ‘not free or fair’.


For all its faults, and to its credit it must be said that the Barisan has delivered to Malaysians across its divided spectrum since independence in 1957, the electoral platform for multi party elections, by embracing the very same machinery for the purpose they inherited from the British and Australians.

In addition it must be said for the BN that, they are at least willing and have demonstrated a capacity and readiness to negotiate on issues relating to potential weaknesses in the electoral laws, processes and procedures. But how far are they able to go  without a legal challenge? How far can they go without the cooperation of those like Bersih who snipe from the sidelines and who are found terribly wanting when it comes to demonstrating their bona fides and proofs. Where is the evidence?

Closely allied to Bersih in its campaigns of smear and misinformation is the DAP. A Chinese nation within a political party complete with its unapologetic displays of its Chinese characters, its cultural symbols wrapped around a political ideologies manifest in its literature to the exclusion of the rest of Malaysia that is not Chinese.

Much like the DAP Ambiga’s Bersih movement is guilty of belting out anti Malay rhetoric as its principal and central political policy. Bersih is devoid of any structured or costed policy alternatives to succeed as an alternative government they aspire to be. Nothing transparent for the public to analyze and to assess.

All that Bersih has to date delivered is the pyrotechnics of a street riot in July 2011 called Bersih 2.0. Their policies consist of rhetoric in all its borrowed forms that simply says “trust us and we will deliver a better future for Malaysians of all races”. Echoes of the great betrayal by Lee Kuan Yew in 1965. Echoes of a more recent Egypt and Syria.

At the centre of all things opposition in Malaysia is the Pakatan Rakyat. The driving force behind Pakatan is  Parti Keadilan Rakyat or better known by its acronym PKR. At its centre and beating heart is its leader (some say charismatic) is a magnet for trouble, negativity and PR disasters one Anwar Ibrahim. Ambiga and Bersih appear to be suffering a burn out at an equally alarming rate as Anwar for much the same reasons.


At the core of the oppositions attack on government is the age old and tired theme of “corruption”. It is a word that has no proper definition in legislative terms in Malaysia. If it has one it is opaque, vague and incapable of effective application in a court. But it has much meaning as many like Ambiga will argue. That being the case, Malaysia’s legal fraternity and many of its judicial officers have to answer for their creativity in interpreting the legislation in the face of a legislative void, which fails to identify or define the term corruption adequately and precisely for it to be effectively or justly applied.

The head of Bersih, that civil societies funded Trojan horse, Ambiga Srinivasan, herself a lawyer and former president of the Malaysian Bar has failed dismally to bring any action against government and it many agencies she accuses of corruption. Nonetheless she continues with her tirades of corruption against the Barisan government. Nothing in admissible evidence to show for her far fetched claims has ever been produced, if it indeed does exist. No procedural steps to take her claims to a properly constituted court. No evidential backing for her claims and accusations but a “wait and see”. Nothing but rhetoric, rhetoric and more poisonous rhetoric.


Ambiga is on the record as having alleged that the elections in the east Malaysian state of Sarawak was not free and fair. In fact she goes further as to state that elections throughout Malaysia have not been free and fair at all. Yet she fails to identify the evidence upon which she relies, to make her claims of corruption against government, in particular the electoral commission.

If Ambiga does possess that evidence of corruption, that smoking gun, she has failed dismally and has shied away from prosecuting the matter in an open court. One must ask why. If the government is as corrupted as Ambiga claims it is she must more than complain or make wild allegations against government. She is after all a lawyer and former president of the Malaysian Bar and an officer of the courts.

Ambiga has a moral obligation and an overriding duty amongst other things to return the Datukship she “earned” through a massive self serving lobbying process she nurtured. The Datukship she holds is inextricably linked with all things Malay which includes the roles and dignity of the sultans of each state and the Yang Di pertuan Agong. She can’t have it both ways. It is disingenuous and patently dishonest of her to continue to enjoy the benefits of the Datukship whilst condemning and disparaging everything it stands for.

Having now brought that sacred Malay institution into disrepute with her conduct she must either put up or shut up.

As an officer of the Federal Court of Malaysia Ambiga and her cohorts in this radical policy free opposition has an overriding obligation to the truth and to uphold the laws of the country. In simple terms this means that if she has evidence of corrupt practices or irregularities relating to the process of elections she should have prosecuted the matter in an open court with the evidence she possesses if she has any. Thus far there has been no lodgement of any suit against the government, electoral officials or the election commission.

Ambiga cannot hold on to evidence that she claims exists. Evidence she claims to hold in her effort to discredit a valid and lawfully elected government. By failing to disclose that evidence (if any) she relies on, she holds herself in contempt. Parliament has the right and the power to summon her before both houses, to compel her to prove her claims of corruption and ‘rigged elections’. This is because by her public venting of her tirades against government she has brought parliament into disrepute.


Ambiga and for that matter Anwar and the DAP all of who sing from the same hymn sheet and from the same page on election rigging, appear quite content  to occupy their non seats in parliament as non Barisan governments at state level. The appear content to occupy their seats as individual and collective opposition in federal parliament. None of them appear shy or conscious enough to vacate their seats or to disentitle themselves to the many benefits and privileges that go with a parliamentary seat and the privileges that go with it. Yet, they continue to complain the elections were rigged. If they were rigged the results must be that their own seats and the state governments they control are by their own call, unlawful.

Selangor is a prime example of how shameless the position of the opposition is in this respect. If they, the opposition and Bersih in particular, did for a moment believe in their claims of rigged elections, they have an obligation to themselves and to their constituents to vacate those seats in parliament.  If they don’t they must be tainted by the same allegations they make against the BN of having benefited from elections that were rigged, ‘not free or fair’. No comment thus far from either Ambiga, Anwar or Kit Siang.


Ambga and Anwar are two people with ‘big tickets’ on their own self assessments. They are two people who hold exceedingly high opinions of themselves. Narcissistic in a word.

Both having been passed over by their peers and, not too soon one,of for good reason, we might add have will have an axe to grind against the whole world.

Ambiga is known to have had lobbied Pak Lah (Abdullah Badawi the former Prime Minister of Malaysia) for appointment to the hallowed post of a judge. She was soundly rejected by her peers. She has not quite forgiven the government blaming Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammed for interfering in the process. Yet she courts Dr. Mahathir’s daughter as an ally and friend. 

Tun being the perennial bogeyman of Malaysian politics has been the target of much vitriol and bile directly by Bersih and its followers. Again none of the allegations against Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammed have been supported by any substance in the form of admissible evidence by the opposition. That is not to say the allegations have no merit. Ambiga’s ambitions for power are likewise not supported by any evidence of her ability or talents to be able to administer a melting pot as diverse and volatile as Malaysia is.

Ambiga and through her Bersih,  has demonstrated no capacity for probity, personal or professional integrity or for policy making. Her personal track record as a lawyer is only adorned by her relationship to a former judge in Malaysia and her Tenure as president of the highly incestuous Malaysian Bar at the governing level.

The quality of her work as a lawyer from the available evidence, of how she managed those matters over which she had conduct, whilst in the employ one of the larger Malaysian law firms, leaves a lot to be desired. However and in defence of her capabilities,her work is at best above average when compared to the standards of the rest of the Malaysian Bar. And that is being generous. But there are those who believe she can walk on water like they did with Anwar.

In this respect Anwar and Ambiga are birds of a feather. Anwar one might recall was once deputy prime minister who believed he would have to do a Napoleon and crown himself before his time lest the kingmaker should change his mind. And that opportunity in his mind could not have come too soon. He gambled his political fortunes away in that one moment of hubris and utter vanity. Ambiga cut out of the same cloth it appears is throwing her all into the Bersih attempt to overthrow government for much the same reasons.

Where merit fails to deliver and it is not the criteria, she like Anwar and their partners in the Pakatan, will make it a casualty. “Never mind the quality just feel the width” (Groucho Marx). The Bersih and opposition campaigns have that feel to it that it inevitably draws on the old saw “never let the truth get in the way of a good story”. Tragically that appears to be the creed of much of the so called alternative media in Malaysia as well who support this opposition

As is the case with allegations of “Corruption” the opposition or Pakatan has also failed to secure a scalp from government which would prove beyond doubt (on the criminal standard) that there is wide spread corruption in government circles as alleged.

The resignation of a minister recently over allegations of misappropriation of public funds is being touted as an opposition initiative to root out corruption in government. On the contrary, informed observers of government and the Westminster system will say otherwise, that Sharizat’s resignation is part of the convention of cabinet solidarity and in keeping with the conventions of integrity in government. Where there is a well founded suspicion of any impropriety, the minister it is said, must or will step down to maintain the integrity of government. Not so according to the opposition. Their standards are different.

Anwar remains at the helm of PR and PKR inspite of the many scandals that plague him and his coalition. Ambiga Srinivasan and other members of the so called opposition movements like Raja Petra Kamaruddin all have loud rattling skeletons in their closets exposed. Yet they choose to remain where they are. Ambitious and destructive to the core desperately wanting to be government.

In concluding I will add this quotation from a statesman of the past who knew a thing or two about hatred. And he belonged in the same right wing camp of American politics that Ambiga and Anwar subscribe to today:

When your enemy hates you he does not win. You hate him and he wins and you destroy yourself“. Richard Millhouse Nixon former US President on his exit from the White House in 1974.


    1. I chose to allow or disallow within whatever time frame I chose for a debate on these issues to run. You have perhaps made it worth our while to enliven the debate however you view it to be. Note you have not raised anything of substance to controvert or to challenge the responses we have provided in red.


  1. She lobbied, in the time of Pak Lah, to be a judge? OMG. This Ambiga should just get into politic & contest in the state of Kelantan, coming GE.
    From what you wrote, I am really surprise as to why should PAS associate themselves with Bersih. Is it about political power/monies? For me, these people are minorities, trying to replace government outside the ballot box.


    1. it is a point we have been trying to make for ages. All smokes and mirrors. The Neo Cons used Habibie after Pak Suharto to do the same thing in Indonesia. The Chinese were slaughtered as were the half caste Timorese. Then the Australians came in as as John Howard said ” they were playing the role of deputy sheriff” in the area on behalf of the US.

      Thank God the Indonesians came to their senses and took back whatever they had including their dignity and their pride as Indonesians. The Chinese got a few crumbs but not another 35 years of a dictator to allow them to rob rape and pillagee the nation and its resources.

      Notice how Susilo Bambang Yodoyono is not as pally with Lee Kuan Yew?


    2. BTW Ambiga is seeking endorsement for a safe seat with one of the opposition parties or will run as an independent candidate at the next general elections. Thats the ploy.
      She has the support of the churches, the NGO’s (foreign) and some journalists like the one Dr. Mahathir deported in 1988. Mr. Berthelsen has been agitating from abroad
      and has been instrumental in advancing anything thats anti Barisan and UMNO. A great champion of NGO’s an the likes of Ambiga who organized that so called independent
      inquiry into the sacking of Tun Salleh Abbas. It was a whitewash to also cast Berthlesen in the light of martyr. Read our article on the sacking of the judges in 1988.


      1. Please do. It exposes the heart of Ambiga Sreenivasan’s political ambitions and the mischief of the Malaysian Bar.


  2. stupid full writings in mat salleh language….U shud provoke and mekings a huge propaganda pretoest to revolute in India against recent Miss MONHAMAN SIGHN in purport to change government rite….then U r the hero to ur own country in India….


  3. Dear GRK,

    I am with you and strongly believe majority of the Malays has been waiting too long for the right time to make an impact and reaction to these noisy minority. It is also very obvious, amounting to total distrust among the fence sitters when Ambiga and gangs keep shifting the goal posts.

    I can see some back lash to Ambiga and gangs in the making now.


    1. Ambiga and her cohorts in Malaysia are the prime example of what they say does not exist. Malaysia is a robust democracy and a vibrant one at that. It is an oasis in a sea of tyranny. In no other place not even in Australia or the UK in the present environment post 9/11 could any opposition secure illegally funds from a state government to overthrow the legitimately elected federal government. It is tantamount to treason. The Malays have a duty towards themselves and their heritage. Their primacy as the people of Malaysia s being challenged ion a most undemocratic way like Lee Kuan Yew did all those years ago and partly succeeded. If you don’t stop it now, you will be overrun and outnumbered.


  4. Agree with you. The Police have not arrested Ambiga and gang, taking the cue from Najib’s stand. Najib is still trying to please everybody and these blokes are taking advantage and exploiting the situation.

    I’m looking for a firm and courageous leader who’d correct the many wrongs in this country and make everybody respect the laws and live by the Constitution fully. That a lawyer doesn’t show respect for the Court Order and incited people to go to Dataran Merdeka, marched with others when the Peaceful Assembly Act does not allow marching – all these are utterly ridiculous thinking. Or lack of it.


    1. It was such a situation that gave rise to Dr. Mahathir many years ago. It will happen again. The Malays must speak with one voice silencing those urban Malays who have had their education in London and other places loosing their identity in the process (Orang Puteh Pantat Hitam….even heard that before?)


  5. well, the pro-western Chinese are numerous enough for the DAP to be called the Chinese Right wing rather than Chauvinist which in itself would be impossible were they a real minority.

    By the way, the zionist criminal nik aziz wants to proclaim that he is behind the proposal for PAS to talk with UMNO, I bet so he can deflect the attention of the unwashed masses from his apt kafir labelling by a former top policeman.

    Also, the so called ‘Malaysian’ opposition does not revert to ‘the alternative media’, they have the ears of the mainstream media including CNN, aljazeera, BBC, Malaysiakini, The edge etc.

    The alternative media is more or less the The star, NST, etc

    On the malaysiakini support to the aussie Nik Xenophobe, perhaps the nationalist media should air some the proto-fascist and Nazi-esque venom they spout against muslims arabs, asians and malaysians in Australia. Strangely Nik Xenophone has nothing to say on this ‘undemocratic’ daily occuracne!

    Keep it up.

    Nik “Netanyahu” Aziz


    1. Why do they only write about these issues. There are “Lawyers” in the opposition who make these claims of rigged elections. No electoral system is perfect.
      Duplication of names and voters especially in the computer age is relevantly an outcome of an imperfect system. However in order to change any
      of the system to achieve that “perfection” that Bersih say they wish for, there has to be proof and not simply “evidence”. This, Ambiga
      the wannabe next prime minister, (who invariably has described herself as being not too diferent to Aung San Su Kuii) can’t come up with. So she
      goes to the streets to achieve a ‘bloody outcome’ at the expense of her public.

      Massive rigging?? come on. Massive lies by Ambiga and Bersih yes. Show us the proof that elections were not free and fair and we will finance the
      court proceedings against the electoral commission.

      It is after all for a public purpose and the public good for these matters to be ventilated in public in the proper forum which is the courts.
      And from this everyone will learn, everyone will benefit. Thus far there have been no takers.

      Ambiga avoids us, avoids the questions whilst her supporters censor our postings on their blogs. Lim Kit Siang, the Malaysian Bar, the Nutt Graph PKR and so on.

      If the elections in Malaysia were not “free and fair”, Ambiga’s friends in the Pakatan have on a moral principle alone, a duty to give up their seats won in an election
      not free and fair and according to them “rigged”. Would you think not? because by occupying seats in a government chamber brought about by elections not free and fair and the
      object of massive “rigging” according to them and you is tantamount to the acknowledgement, acceptance and benefiting from a criminal enterprise or the last aiding and abbetting
      in the commision of a crime.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: