NAJIB’S TRIAL- A BLESSING IN DISGUISE

MAHATHIR A REFINED SADDAM HUSSEIN

The comparison between Dr. Mahathir and Saddam Hussein grows stronger by the day. He is by way of a show arrest and trial sending a clear and unequivocal message to his followers and adversaries alike, “I mean business and I will stop at nothing”. His is a none too subtle a use of force to quell any opposition to his rule but not quite as extreme as that of his role model Saddam Hussein.

This is what Mahathir did for 2 decades in his previous term as prime minister of Malaysia. And why would he change that trait now especially where his own misdeeds and crimes are yet to be purged and the subject of unfinished inquiry. Intimidation and force is what kept Mahathir in office for over  2 decades. It is effective.

As was the case with Saddam’s reign, none of those who benefit from his largesse and protection believe that they too could one day experience the rapidly changing character of a bi polar, schizophrenic leader as Mahathir and Saddam are said to be.

WHAT IS CORRUPTION IN MALAYSIAN LAW? DOES THE RULE OF LAW EXIST?

The problem with charging anyone for corruption in Malaysia lies with its laws. Malaysian legislation struggles to meet acceptable standards where the drafting of laws is concerned. One look at the legislation and one understands why the common law has to kick in. The written law is as dyslexic as the person who has to read and understand it. It is devoid of definition. Corruption is not only unspecific it is verbose and confusing in its legislative form.

Putting that defect to one side, the doctrine of rule of law requires that, anyone making an accusation of corruption or any other wrong doing against anyone else has to themselves be blameless. Unless of course the law specifies otherwise.

The maxim “he who comes to equity must be prepared to do equity. He who comes to equity must come with hands clean” is absent in this Mahathir versus Najib fight.

HOW CLEAN IS MAHATHIR-HOW INDEPENDENT ARE HIS COURTS AND HOW DEPENDABLE OR INDEPENDENT IS THE US AS WITNESSAGAINST NAJIB?

A cursory look by anyone at the maxim and the underlying rule of law doctrine that underpins the legal system anywhere will compel them to ask the question “how clean is the Mahathir administration? how clean is Mahathir and his family? and how clean is the legal system in Malaysia to try anyone fairly today?”

It was not long ago that the world (the west) referred to Mahathir as a madman, a dictator’ corrupt and ‘undemocratic’ ‘anti west and an anti semite’ all rolled into one. So why the change of heart and the silence in the face of what is obviously a complex matter even the US has been unable to resolve for 3 years.

In the US (a now deeply divided society) the pro Hillary Clinton forces and the anti Trump forces have different views of government, governance, rights and wrongs and the power a president and administration is able to wield especially as against foreign states. If it serves the greater good of the US that’s all that matters.

Trump is an embattled president. His own forces are divided through corruption inherited from the Hillary Obama administrations and with divided loyalties within government, its foreign service and its security apparatus.

As former CIA operatives Robert Baer, Valerie Palme and the very early CIA defectors like Phillip Agee and Victor Marchetti had exposed, NGO’s the other organizations like the ICJ (International Commission of Jurists) as opposed to the more respectable and recognized International Court of Justice were all created and funded or infiltrated by the CIA to bring down governments in places like Malaysia. That strategy and the methods remain the same today.

WHY NAJIB? WHEN MAHATHIR IS SAID TO HAVE BEEN COMPLICIT IN JALIL IBRAHIM’S MURDER AND IN THE UNLAWFUL DETENTION AND TORTURE OF ARAB SUPECTS AFTER 9/11 (BITRAC)

The question on everyone’s mind is “why Najib?” After all what is termed “corruption” and corruption by the common law definition did not begin with the Najib administration.

Corruption by its linguistic definition is a practice so deeply entrenched and institutionalized within the Chinese, Indian and Malay communities as virtues. It has benefitted colonial governments, local communities and allies alike without hindrance  for centuries. Any application of the English law definition (which is absent in Malaysian legislation) to local situations as being a criminal offence is often tokenistic and political in nature. “Corruption” as Mahathir charges Najib with was rampant during the previous Mahathir era. So why now with Najib?

Corruption in its institutionalization form developed and took root on an industrial scale during the era of Dr. Mahathir Mohammad in the 1970’s and extended to include his entire family.

He vetted every large government funded contract and license and dished these out to the Chinese who had a Malay tail tied to them. A Mahathir approved Malay tail. No questions, no debate, no public tenders no scrutiny.

There are  also the Royal Houses from Perak to Johor caught up in corruption on  a grand scale which is how the wily Mahathir is able to hold the Sultan’s of Malaysia to ransom and get them to bend over and do his bidding at will.

NAJIB A THORN IN THE SIDE OF HILLARY CLINTON AND THE CIA’S JOHN MALLOT.

Najib was singled out for destruction by the US for two reasons.

Najib failed to bow to Hillary Clinton’s demands for ‘contributions’ to the Clinton Global Foundation and to her ideals and ideas of globalization.

Najib was advised and knew full well how Hillary was squeezing smaller governments and apportioning to herself and her presidential ambitions, money given to her by kings and rulers for her ‘noble causes’; failing which if they refused she set about destroying them with internal rebellion. Regime Change.

Libya as unfinished CIA vs Hillary business is but a case in point.

To place money in someone’s personal account is as easy and natural in banking as it is to blink one’s eye. It is the taking or withdrawing of money out of someone else’s account that is the difficult part.

How easy it is to set up someone you don’t like” by world renowned layer and Emeritus Professor of law at Harvard: Alan Dershowitz.

An amount that runs into billions of dollars under international bi-lateral agreements to counter money laundering compels the reserve bank of a participating country to report the transaction.

Bank Negara under Zeti did not report the transaction. Why? Well that’s for the evidence at any trial to reveal. What is known is that Zeti alerted the media of a large transaction through the sources she was beholden to like Dr. Mahathir and his team. Zeti is a personal friend of John Mallot through his late wife. John Mallot is a rabid anti Muslim Regime fanatic and CIA operative (former US Ambassador to Malaysia).

Zeti did not formally inform anyone she was obliged to inform of the very large transaction involving Najib’s account. Mahathir’s group did that. They went to the US with that information and contacted the FBI and the department of justice.

In the meantime the US under Mallot created the fiction about C4 explosives being used to blow up Altantuya provided by Najib, a story that failed after Cpl. Sirul confessed to the fiction in Australia.

THE IRONY OF HE CIA’S ACTIONS- CHANGING HORSES MID RACE-CHANGING RULES FOR EACH EVENT

John Mallot had set up the mechanics for such an operation for disinformation and set up channels within the US for Malaysian dissidents during the Mahathir era. The irony of it all is that the infrastructure the US created in Malaysia to bring down Najib was originally grounded on an anti-Mahathir campaign to bring down the Mahathir government. It was designed to topple Mahathir and bring Anwar Ibrahim into power in 1997.

Unfortunately for the Americans John Mallot was no match for Dr. Mahathir’s wit and cunning. 9/11 intervened and the campaign for destabilization of Malaysia took a back seat in Washington.

In the interim Mallot’s Japanese wife died and it slowed things down for this ultra-right wing CIA rogue operative. That’s what Mallot is considered to be amongst his colleagues. He destroyed Pakistan as a case officer of the CIA there and Muslim radicals are on the lookout for him.

Najib chose to turn to China with US interference in his country’s affairs becoming unbearable under Hillary Clinton and president Obama. The Chinese offers to Malaysia was simply too good to refuse. The Chinese were not doing anything in Malaysia they had not done anywhere else including in Australia and the US seeking out commercial opportunities.

HOW THE CHINESE NOW OWN AUSTRALIA ITS GOVERNMENT AND ITS SOCIAL AND POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS

In Australia the Chinese went so far as to buy up politicians like Australia’s foreign minister Julie Bishop, former trade minister Andrew Robb with a monthly $75,000 plus plus contract, Sam Dastyari, former prime minister Kevin Rudd and journalists including some at the ABC. They also corrupted and bought out a former ASIO  in Roger Uren with a honey trap.

When pressure began to build on the Australian government on revelations of Chinese infiltration in their services and ranks, they sacrificed Sam Dyastiari, an Iranian born politician to keep the hounds at bay.

Dyastiari had warned a Chinese spy that he was being watched by ASIO in exchange for payment of $1500 to clear Dyastiari’s credit card debt. That incident ended Dyastiari’s career.

Julie Bishop however after admonishing Najib and adding to the ‘anti corruption’ campaign against him continues to serve as Australia’s foreign minister unrepentant.

The second reason the US wanted Najib out was Najib’s refusal to arrest without cause 4 Arab nationals staying at a retired military major’s flat in Cheras in KL in 2001 when he was minister of defence. That incident is what angered John Mallot.

The 4 it was later discovered were in the 3 jets that flew into the twin towers and into history that fateful day on 9/11. That’s when Najib’s real problems began.

John Mallot was described as a failure by his colleagues after that event and he has not forgiven Najib for denying him his moment of glory in history, instead bringing his reputation as a CIA operative into disrepute.

Whatever Mahathir does to Najib if under the law and before an independent judiciary will necessarily blow back on him and his own activities and crimes. That he will try to conceal under privilege and the official secrets act.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments
2 Responses to “NAJIB’S TRIAL- A BLESSING IN DISGUISE”
  1. Motti says:

    Why don’t you expose Maria Chin Abdullah too? Her background is bogus. Her husband never served in Force 17. Ask any Palestinian. If you can do this, I am sure many Malaysians will start exposing other frauds in the Malaysian government and media.

    Like

    • grkumar says:

      Maria Chin Abdullah is a political whore with nothing to offer this world other than her genitals. Even then there is nothing there except for a desperate runaway failed insignificant Palestinian only.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: